If I’m so tied to Frank Russo, where’s MY job been the last 22 years?

August 16th, 2010

With big Frank Russo news hitting fast and furious almost every week now (hell, almost every day), there’s a hilarious refrain coming from obvious quarters that I, by reason of my last name, must be tied to all of it.  Why hilarious?

Because if I was so tied to Frank Russo, the county Democratic Party, Jimmy Dimora, and all that, don’t you think I’d have a job in county government by now?  Apparently, they can be created in a matter of seconds for anyone at all, including people under investigation.

Now, before we start throwing the 2002 criminal conviction around, I’ve been in Democratic Party politics in this town, county, and state since 1988.  I have not once – NOT ONCE – been offered a single job in county, city, state, or federal government.  Not in 22 years, including the 9 years since I got into trouble.  My last name being Russo didn’t seem to help at any point.  I did finally get a little sugar after the 1996 re-elect, when I got sent abroad for NDI.  But that had zero to do with anyone on the ground in Cleveland, it was sheer persistence on my part, and I won it on substance.

Frank Russo would not recognize me if I shoved my mom’s canoli in his face.  Neither would Jimmy Dimora, despite me working with Democrats on his ticket before, during, and after he was chairman.  And before spending the last 9 years burning every scintilla of evidence that I ever worked for any Democrat in Ohio, these folks spent the previous 13 years ignoring me, and every single other person not in their circle.  Why?  Because the criminal racket that is currently under this cloud is so tribal, so small and cabal-like, so virulently insular, that not even your last name matching the ring leader’s gets you anywhere.  THAT’S how corrupt county government has become.

And that’s one reason why I’m running for this seat.

Video of the Jeff Hess coffee house tour!!

August 16th, 2010

I visited Artefino on Superior across from the PD building to say hi to Jeff Hess, whose Tim Russo coffeehouse tour has been ongoing, and will continue through the primary election.  Here’s a little vignette, and a pitch for donations!!

So, um…..I think Terri Hamilton Brown has a shot

August 15th, 2010

Time for me to put my political blogger hat on about the county executive race, simply because Terri Hamilton Brown has kind of forced me to pay attention.

County Council District 7 is unique among all the seats, in that it includes typically white, west side areas, and typically African American east side areas, in big chunks.  Very diverse.  And as a guy knocking on doors constantly, I get to see what’s going on at the ground level pretty closely.  So what’s going on out there?

Brown’s visibility in the part of District 7 that’s her base (Wards 7, 8, 9, and part of 12) is pretty dramatic.  I see her signs everywhere, constantly.  Ed Fitzgerald?  I don’t see many Fitzgerald signs at all.  There are a few here and there in response to a Brown sign, but whatever Fitzgerald signs that are out there arrived late, and in small numbers.  And in the western part of District 7, I can’t recall seeing any Fitzgerald signs at all.

Maybe Fitzgerald is ignoring the city of Cleveland in favor of the suburbs, but whenever I go out to visit mom in Middleburg, I ain’t seeing any Fitzgerald signs there, either.

This tells me that Terri Hamilton Brown could pull off a surprise on September 7.

That sound you hear is the division bell

August 12th, 2010

Most people think of this term in relation to Pink Floyd’s 1994 album.  To me, because I’ve worked in British politics, the division bell retains its original meaning.

The bell is used in the local neighbourhood of the Parliament to signal a division is occurring and that members in the Commons or in the House of Lords have eight minutes to get to the appropriate Division Lobby to vote for or against the resolution.

A division bell is ringing right now among people who have known me for a long time.  I’ve been prepared for this division to take place by the fact that it has been occurring among people who know me for the last 9 years.  Some go one way, others stay right where they are.

It’s not so fun in real life, but this is normal in an election campaign.  People have to choose.  So they’re starting to choose.  The bad news is that sometimes, the division bell rings, and people you didn’t think would go one way do, in fact, go that way.  The good news is that the people remaining with you, for the most part, are the ones you really want to stick around anyway.

We’ve got less than 4 weeks to go, and that bell’s just gonna keep right on ringing.  We’ll see who’s on the winning side soon enough.

More thank you cards in production – I’ve created at least one job!

August 12th, 2010

For DJBG.

Cities and counties that have already banned the box

August 12th, 2010

The National Employment Law Project advocates for banning the box on employment applications that ask about criminal history.

NELP has been a leader in the movement to restore fairness to the process of criminal background checks and remove unnecessary or badly-designed barriers to the employment of people with criminal records.  We promote model employment policies and basic protections that allow qualified workers with records to attain and retain quality jobs

A NELP document (pdf) lists the 20 cities and counties in the country that have banned the box as of February, 2010.  And here’s a model hiring practices document for cities and counties looking to ban the box.  As county councillor, I’ll be introducing all of this into hearings, and asking NELP to testify, once I introduce my own county ordinance to ban the box in Cuyahoga County.

Now THIS is a Republican I can work with – wanna legalize pot, Matt?

August 11th, 2010

Matt Brakey stopped by yesterday to comment on my post supporting his position to ban traffic cameras in Cuyahoga County.  There’s so much awesomeness in his comment, I have to go through it one by one.

Maybe we can agree on a few more issues:

Can we agree that the county’s drug laws are disproportionately targeting poor minority communities and our justice system needs to be wholly reformed?

Agreed in whole.  That’s one reason why I advocate to ban the box on employment applications asking about past criminal convictions.  In addition, I’d very much like to know why the county prosecutor’s office was the only remaining countywide elected position in county government under the new charter.

I’m also in favor of legalization of marijuana in Cuyahoga County, in much the same way as California is about to do by referendum.  I can’t think of a single step that would relieve more pressure on our justice system, employ more people, faster, and result in quicker fixing of stretched governmental budgets through tax revenue, than legalizing the sale, purchase and use of marijuana, with almost no negative effects whatsoever.  Let’s continue, shall we?

Can we agree that much of what passes as government “economic development” is just an enrichment of special interests — a wealth transfer from poor to rich.

Yes, and these corpulent, monied interests have their candidates in this county election.  A couple of them are even in my primary.  County government needs a voice or two in opposition to the constant looting of taxpayer dollars for the wealthy few.  I plan to be one of them.

Can we agree that the existing political establishment within both parties will do nothing to benefit the people of Cuyahoga County, and that we need candidates that will stand up to the party machines and special interests?

Yes, and that’s why I’m running on a tagline “not related to Frank.”  I’m confident voters will recognize that of the 9 people in my primary, I’m the only Democrat who will stand up to the party machines and special interests.

I am a big proponent of civil liberties and suspect there is much overlap to be had. Let’s not get stuck in this D/R paradigm.

I only get stuck in the “D/R paradigm” if the R advocates a total capitulation to the hard right teabaggers who are less in touch with reality than Ted Kazcynski.  Sounds like Matt Brakey might be a guy I could work with.

I agree with Republican Matt Brakey on traffic cameras

August 10th, 2010

I first came across traffic cameras when they were all the rage in Britain in the late 1990′s, early 2000′s.  By then, they had become objects of vandalism.  People would literally blow holes in them with shotguns, set them on fire, tape them up with duct tape – they were, and remain, despised.

When Cleveland started using them, I knew it would only be a matter of time before the push back began.  Traffic cameras have become a campaign issue in the county council races, with Republican Matt Brakey finding quite possibly the only issue on which I will agree with a Republican.  The New York Times has noticed.

The issue has bubbled up in places like Cleveland, where Matt Brakey, a 29-year-old businessman seeking a spot on the Cuyahoga County Council, has proclaimed his opposition to traffic cameras on his campaign Web site and at events like one he recently held at a busy intersection where he unfurled a banner announcing his stance.

“There were lots of honks,” said Mr. Brakey, a Republican and first-time candidate for office. “This issue really taps into the general dissatisfaction with government.”

Here’s what it “taps into” for me, and has done since I saw my first traffic camera in the UK over 10 years ago – in the United States, traffic cameras are unconstitutional.  Why?  Because you cannot cross examine the “witness” to your crime, the camera.  Your guilt or innocence comes down to whether or not the government can certify that the traffic camera is accurately calibrated.  The camera cannot prove or testify that you were the driver, therefore the person breaking the law.  It can only certify that it is accurate, and that certification comes from the prosecution, which itself is biased.

Therefore, a traffic camera violates due process of law as guaranteed by the penumbras and emanations from the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendments of the US Constitution.  As candidate for county council, I oppose the use of traffic cameras, and as a member of county council for District 7, which includes the vast majority of traffic cameras in Cuyahoga County, I will work to see that traffic cameras are removed from my district.

And if Matt Brakey wins his race, and we sit together in county council, I will happily co-sponsor bi-partisan county legislation to ban the use of traffic cameras in Cuyahoga County permanently.

Not related to Frank

August 8th, 2010

Last night’s bus tour was pretty great.  The best line we could deliver from the bullhorn was “not related to Frank”.  Got laughs every time.

Video of me voting for me

August 6th, 2010