Archive for the ‘Transparency’ Category

Now it’s getting serious

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

Getting down to the nitty gritty  - I’m staring down a big stack of door knocking, and it looks like I’m not gonna be blogging much at all from here on out.  Won’t stop me from trying, especially on our super extravaganza bus tour on Saturday – join us!

I’m learning a lot about the difference between the campaign manager/consultant and the candidate, stuff I kinda already knew, but stuff that’s being confirmed to this consultant turned candidate on a daily basis.  We’ve morphed – from sorta fun, quixotic adventure in authenticity and Hunter S. Thompson in your face-ness, to legit candidacy with a real shot.  Because of this, my instincts are kicking in.  Those instincts include taking things over, driving them, and managing.  Like I used to.

Which I guess is a good thing, personally.  I would never have had the confidence to turn such a corner absent this candidacy – to use my own skills as they should be used, to their best effect.  This race has been a huge success already on that front, win or lose.  Problem is, candidates really shouldn’t be campaign managers, for a number of reasons.  Unfortunately, this campaign won’t have that luxury.

So it’s full steam ahead.  We return you to your regular programming.

Learning how true this is every single day

Sunday, August 1st, 2010

Puttin’ the B in LGBT.

Blogger meets candidate – candidate wins. For the moment.

Saturday, July 31st, 2010

I just spent all day knocking on doors.  I was covered in that thin layer of dried sweat, the one that feels like it’s gonna stick to you forever.  After my shower, I had a thought for a blog post.  So here it is!

The campaign consultant blogger in me really wants to blog super meta about how this thing is going, the lay of the land, the intrigue, the tactics, the strategy.  The candidate in me wants to keep his damn mouth shut, for a number of reasons, not least being that I am the best political mind in this race, with the most experience running campaigns, I know what I’m doing, why should I give my opponents any free access to that so they can use it in their own campaigns?   Duh.

Here’s an example.  This week, I got an email from a PD reporter asking all sorts of questions about the fact that more than 60% of the voters in the May primary voted by mail, wondering how this would affect my campaign’s strategy and tactics.  Um…dude.  You think I’m gonna tell that to the PD?  Before the primary?  Please.  I wrote back, “Early vote changes everything.”  End of comment.

So the blogger in me is taking a back seat to the candidate who wants to win.  For now.  I have a whole host of stories just clogging up the blog queue, some of which certain people will find verrrrry interesting.  They may manage to make their way out after September 7.  In the meantime, despite every ounce of my being clawing at me to do otherwise, this blogger is going to keep his cards close to his vest.

Which is probably breaking news, somewhere.

Making you say it

Saturday, July 17th, 2010

In law school, you learn about the various societal values of criminal law, and the theories of punishment.  One such theory of punishment is the retributive theory.  Basically the “eye for an eye” theory – this holds that there is societal value in exacting retribution on the defendant.  That somehow this balances the scales of justice by taking away something from the perpetrator.

I’ve always rejected the retributive theory of justice, because there is no evidence that it works to stop crime.  All it does is make you feel good.  It’s revenge.  It makes you feel superior to others.  It’s entirely selfish.  It’s overly pious.  It does nothing to deter crime.  Often, it does not allow for rehabilitation, because retribution tends to become a slippery slope toward endless retribution.  It’s also not very Christian.  It doesn’t allow for forgiveness, or ultimate redemption.  Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord.  Not yours.

I’m reminded of this lately, because a good many folks like to force me, then watch me tell them what I did 9 years ago that got me into trouble.  It’s weird.  They know what I did.  They know everyone else who cares knows what I did.  They know it was almost a decade ago.  They know I don’t have to register as a sex offender, they know there was no victim, they know the sentence I paid was as light as it could possibly be.  They know it’s been in the newspaper repeatedly lately, on TV, all over the internet.  And they know that on my old blog there are countless words written on the topic, by me, about me, and my crime.  All they have to do is Google my name.

Yet, these people really want to hear me, no….watch me recite the facts of what I did, in front of them, and in front of others.  They want to make you say it.

When this happens, I don’t know whether I handle it well or not – it throws me, because I can’t believe there are human beings in this world who actually want to watch you endlessly flog yourself in front of them for their own enjoyment.  I do know it’s a pathetically sad display on the part of people who really ought to have something better to do than engage in endless retributive vengeance on someone who paid for his crime in full almost a decade ago.  I’d say they should be ashamed of themselves, but shame doesn’t appear to be in their vocabulary.

I’ll continue to trudge along, and will now come up with a clever retort which I will use in such instances going forward, as it does appear I’ll have to get used to people wanting to make me say it.  You all need to get a life.

Should I even bother to attend the PD ed board July 20?

Sunday, July 4th, 2010

I’ve been busily filling out endorsement questionnaires from various groups interested in the county council races…mostly labor unions (yay!) and a couple others.  The Plain Dealer sent one, too.  It was typically arrogant – this is what you’ll do, this is when you’ll do it, and so it shall be.  All kinds of requirements for photo sizes, stupid stuff like that.  My “interview” is scheduled for 11am, Tuesday, July 20.

Yippee.

Aside from the fact the PD has plenty of photos of me, recent ones even, and knows more about me because of my blogging than they will ever know about any of my opponents (or anyone running for anything, for that matter), most of which they ignore in favor of the salacious, I’ve been wondering if I should even waste my time to attend.  I know they’re not going to endorse me.  And I know how the interview is going to go.  I’ll be lucky if one of them doesn’t spit on me.

So I thought I’d ask folks what they think…..should I bother?  I mean, I guess it could be good blogging material.  Maybe I’ll be surprised and have a substantive discussion.  My campaign is about transparency, so I guess I kind of have to attend, but when this interview, as sure as the sun coming up tomorrow, is bound to be about as fair and transparent as the oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico right now, what’s the point?

I don’t know.  I guess it could be fun.

Roldo’s right – MedMart deal needs vast amounts of oversight applied to it. I’ll start January 1.

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

I’ve been critical of Roldo in the past, which is a lonely place to be in Cleveland.  It’s a sort of sacrilege to criticize Roldo – he’s so often right, why take a shot at the guy?

Well, I’m a Cleveland sports fan, and Roldo spent the better part of two decades having nothing good to say at all about Gateway.  Yeah, it was a big giveaway.  Yeah, rich spoiled athletes and their rich masters/owners don’t need our taxpayer money.  But sometimes, it makes sense – economically, politically, regionally – to invest in something that creates what Gateway has created, even if the guys you’re dealing with are already filthy rich.

Just about the only reason anyone goes downtown for recreation anymore, especially families, revolves around sports.  Can you imagine downtown Cleveland if the Indians and Cavs had both left town?  It’s practically dead now.  The prospect of Lebron leaving is going to be a crushing blow to our economy.  Yes, Gateway is a boondoggle, so is Browns Stadium, and yes, they’re probably about as Dickensian a display of our economic system as this guy who overuses the word “Dickensian” could ever think to describe.  But Gateway was necessary, so was Browns Stadium, and I’m standing by that.

Med Mart?  That’s where I’m joining Roldo in drawing the line.

The County has given very little information on how the nearly $100 million already collected is being spent. The Plain Dealer – bastion of County reform – has neglected to tell the public exactly how the money is being spent…

Med Mart will sit in my county council district, District 7.  The tax to fund it is a county tax which will last for 20 years.  Starting on January 1, 2011, if I’m in this county council, I intend to crawl up MMPI’s ass with a microscope to learn precisely where that money is going.  That’s just the beginning.

I also plan to revisit the strangely odd, sudden, and jurisdictionally challengable state exemption of the MedMart facility from property taxes.  I also plan to make sure there are minority hiring requirements at MedMart, something that wasn’t included in the casino enabling legislation.  Specifically, I plan to make non-discrimination against ex-offenders a priority in MedMart hiring – ex-offenders are a largely minority group, they need access to jobs, or they are more likely to return to crime.  And there a lot of them in District 7.

Why all this?  Because MMPI is taking county taxpayer money by the tens of millions of dollars.  That means the taxpayers’ elected representatives on January 1, 2011, get to make the rules. Take it away, Roldo.

Is there no justice at all? Are we to be suckers forever?

The answer to that is no.

Canvassed my first Operation Chaos teabagger yesterday….oy.

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

When I trained political parties in new democracies abroad, especially campaign managers and candidates, the number one question I’d get asked was this – What’s the most effective way to campaign?  The questioner was usually looking for some alchemy of tactics, strategy, data, media, advertising, etc, which when stewed just perfectly,VOILA yields victory on election day.

My answer was always the same.  The single most effective way to campaign for votes is for the candidate to meet the voter face to face and ask for their vote.  Period.  Everything short of that pales in comparison.

In this spirit we launched canvassing this weekend.  It’s my intention to canvass on my own every day until the election, and on weekends with volunteers.  There will, of course, be days when I just need a rest, and days when I’m out of town for work, but for 3 days straight, I’ve been knocking on doors.  I’ve already gotten a great response, almost all positive.  But here’s a fun one I can blog about.

I canvassed my first teabagger.  Not just any teabagger, but the kind that Anthony identified, the sort that follows Rush Limbaugh’s every word like it’s God’s command, and did so in 2008 to vote in the presidential primary for Hillary Clinton just to fuck with Barack Obama.  Dude was listed as a D on my walk list, but did not helpfully fly the “Don’t Tread On Me” flag like other such Operation Chaosers, so I was a sitting duck. When I walked up to his door, he was across the street, saw me heading to his door, and charged across the street from his neighbor’s to tell me a thing or too about…..the hell if I know.

Out spurted an endless litany of every unchallengeable canon of wingnuttia in a blizzard of incoherence.  I’d detail it, but I can’t begin to remember it all.  Put FoxNews, Rush, and Beck into a blender, add the email smears, hit puree, pour it onto the sidewalk, and that’s what came out of this guy’s mouth.  I kept waiting for him to take a breath, but it was just constant – I would not be getting one word in, thank you very much.  Then he wouldn’t let me walk away!!  I must have said “agree to disagree” ten times to try to escape, but he kept going.  I finally just left him standing there, at which point he got the picture.

Having videoed hundreds of these people, I wasn’t surprised at all by the behavior.  What surprised me was the willingness to harangue someone, without end, who identified himself as a Barack Obama Democrat, and a candidate for office, in broad daylight, while neighbors watched, with total hysterical nonsense.  I mean…wow.

There’s definitely an anthropological study in there somewhere, for some enterprising young PhD student.

Canvass pics – Ben Franklin Community Garden in Old Brooklyn

Saturday, May 29th, 2010

We kicked off our weekly canvasses today – couldn’t ask for better Memorial Day weekend weather in which to knock on doors.  We fanned out across the South Hills neighborhood of Old Brooklyn, and I wrapped things up at the Benjamin Franklin Community Garden.  What a beautiful little nook of Cleveland.

It is one of the City’s earliest examples of the development and use of eco-friendly urban space.  With 204 plots and on average 180 gardeners per year, Ben Franklin is an incredible peaceful oasis.

It’s the size of two football fields, and every inch of it is tended with great care.  On June 19, it will be designated a historic site, having been there since 1912.  Folks were planting today.  Here are a few pics.

No one asks Drew Carey about his ideas, while their result spews into the gulf

Friday, May 28th, 2010

Drew Carey came to town yesterday to defend his ridiculous libertarian video series on the wingnut funded Reason.tv.  I was busy helping a friend with some paint work yesterday, or I might have attended.  I just watched Mike McIntyre’s interview, and Cool Cleveland’s poorly streaming video, and in between the pathetic fawning, boy, is Drew backpedaling from the Reason.tv series.  Lots of “I wouldn’t have done it that way” nonsense.

Carey doesn’t back down on his ideas, because no one challenges them in this coverage.  The coverage focuses on everything but Carey’s ideas, which amount to complete deregulation of business.  Neither McIntyre nor Thonas Mulready bother to ask about any of the libertarian utopian pap that Carey espoused.  Maybe in the PD’s Part 2 McIntyre will ask Carey the Rand Paul question?  Who knows.

Well, this is what total deregulation of business leads to.

Which then leads to this.

And if you were to walk through Slavic Village, you would see that what Drew Carey proposes leads to this.

And lest anyone forget, deregulation led to this.

When media refuse to even discuss, let alone challenge, the policy ideas of people like Drew Carey, they leave voters and all of us unequipped to make informed decisions about our future.  Lost in the celebrity, the blow by blow, the personalities, the stupidity, our self-proclaimed media watch dogs take a little doggie treat, take their seat on the front porch and commence to gnawing, while the thieves take everything out of the house.

Republican conservatism has fed on this pattern, for decades now, in service to precisely the ideology Drew Carey is advocating for Cleveland.  Well, thanks to the internet, which exists because government literally created it, you don’t have to rely on the PD to do your homework for you.  If you want to see the result of Drew Carey’s ideas, here’s the live feed of the filth this ideology now spews into our ocean at a pace of 12,000 barrels a day.

Broken pottery can be art, you know

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

Been getting a few folks wondering why my campaign is so….shall we say….irreverent.  So…weird.  So…purposely off key.  By the way, here’s a draft of our new campaign t-shirts! Awesome!

I guess this is good news…the concerns are getting louder because it’s beginning to dawn on folks that I’ve got a shot.  As if I didn’t know this.  Anyway, the concern goes kinda like this.  You’re giving people a reason to NOT take you seriously, Tim.  People aren’t going to vote for you if you act so flippant, Tim.  Then there’s my favorite – Tim, this looks arrogant, like you think you’re owed this seat.  Me?  Arrogant?

First, let’s recall that I’ve been working in politics my entire career, at all levels, in many countries, with the highest stakes, on big wins, big losses, total catastrophes, and magical Cinderella stories.  If I didn’t think as hard about my own first run for public office as I did for all those other races, I’d be an idiot.  And after all that thinking, if this is the sort of campaign that emerges, take it to the bank, folks, it’s probably the only way I can win.  I kind of know what I’m doing.

Let’s next recall that I have a sex felony conviction.  This means a couple things – first, it means I need to take whatever support I can get, from wherever it comes, in whatever form anyone wants to deliver it.  That means if someone wants to volunteer art for a campaign ad, and the art looks like this, then I am happy to accept it.  It’s actually liberating – I don’t think about campaign consultant crap, I don’t have to listen to the various George Stephanopoulii thinking they know what they’re talking about.

The conviction also forces a choice.  I can either (A) run from it, pretend it doesn’t exist, or worse, go around being Mr. Milk Toast Candidate Guy as if everyone on earth has just decided to forget about my past, or (B) I can embrace my past as part of who I am, and try to make that work in my favor.  I think we all agree, Option A is a fantasy.  So the question becomes, how best to embrace Option B, make my past part of me, but definitively the past.

Terry Schwarz, senior planner at Kent State’s Urban Design collaborative in Cleveland, gave a talk at TEDxCLE in February that explains it best.  Here’s the slide from Terry’s presentation that applies.

Terry explained the Japanese tradition of kintsugi – artfully repairing damaged objects.  You can either fix a broken piece of pottery (or a city) by trying to repair the break seamlessly, making the break invisible, or by highlighting the damaged part, thus indicating that the piece had been broken, calling attention to the damage.  The Japanese believe such repair gives honor to the piece’s history.  The repaired object often becomes more valuable than it was before it was broken.

That’s what I’m trying to do in this campaign.

Voters in this primary are going to know about my conviction.  Undecided voters will judge my candidacy on how I’ve dealt with it.  I am choosing to deal with it in precisely this manner.  This “break” is part of my story, I can’t make it disappear.  So I’m choosing to repair it demonstratively, creating a new piece, which if done right, is something of greater value than before it was broken.

Running for office with a criminal conviction of this type is already unheard of.  My real gamble politically is that voters who have an open mind about me will decide that someone who deals with this rather severe break, in this way, is someone they want for their county councilor.  I certainly know my strongest supporters will approve – after all, they’re the ones delivering this kind of campaign with their own hands.  And in a low turnout election, where the enthusiasm of your base is what will win the race, that’s a gamble I think I win.

For me personally, if I lose, i.e. if voters decide they don’t like how I dealt with this break, at least I will like how I dealt with it, how it would have made Hunter S. Thompson proud, how I’ve left behind a story to tell, and I will be left with a life more valuable than the one that was broken.   Perhaps my supporters will, too.

But I’m gonna win, so I don’t think we’ll have that problem.